Corfinium

CORFI´NIUM(Κορφίνιον: Eth. Corfiniensis: S. Pelino), the chief city of the Peligni, situated in the valley of the Aternus, near the point where that river suddenly makes a sharp angle, and turns from a SE. to a NE. course, which it pursues from thence to the Adriatic. It was distant 7 miles from Sulmo, and 30 from Alba Fucensis by the Via Valeria. There can be no doubt that Corfinium was from an early period the capital city of the Peligni, and one of the chief towns in this part of Italy; but no mention of its name is found in history until the outbreak of the Marsic or Social War, B.C. 90, when it was selected by the confederates to be their common capital, and the seat of their government. It was probably to the importance of its situation in a military point of view that it was mainly indebted for this distinction; but the allied nations seem to have destined it to be the permanent capital of Italy, and the rival of Rome, as they changed its name to Italica, and adorned it with a new and spacious forum and senate house, and other public buildings of a style corresponding to its intended greatness. (Strab. 5. p. 241; Vellei. 2.16; Diod. xxxvii. Exc. Phot. p. 538.) But before the end of the second year of the war they were compelled to abandon their new capital, and transfer the seat of government to Aesernia. (Diod. l. c.p. 539.) The fate of Corfinium after this is not mentioned, but it probably fell into the hands of the Romans without resistance, and in consequence did not suffer; for we find it at the outbreak of the Civil War between Caesar and Pompey, B.C. 49, still retaining its position as a city of importance and a strong fortress. On this account it was occupied by L. Domitius with, 30 cohorts, and was the only place which offered any effectual resistance to the arms of Caesar during his advance through Italy. Nor was it reduced by force, but the disaffection which rapidly spread among his officers compelled Domitius to surrender after a siege of only seven days. (Caes. B.C. 1.15—23; Appian, App. BC 2.38; Cic. ad Att. 8.3, 5, 9.7; Suet. Jul. 34; Lucan (Luc. 2.478—510.) From this time we hear but little of Corfinium; but inscriptions attest that it continued to be a flourishing municipal town under the Roman empire, and its prosperity is proved by the fact that its inhabitants were able to construct two aqueducts for supplying it with water, both of which are in great part hewn in the solid rock, and one of them is carried through a tunnel nearly 3 miles in length. (Romanelli, vol. iii. pp. 149—151; Orell. Inscr. 3695, 3696; Mommsen, Inscr. Neap. 5350, foll.) A part of the territory of Corfinium had been portioned out to new settlers as early as the time of the Gracchi: it received a fresh body of colonists under Augustus, but never assumed the title of a colony, all inscriptions giving it that of a municipium only. (Lib. Colon.pp. 228, 255.) It still appears in the Itineraries as a place of importance ( Itin. Ant. p. 310; Tab. Pent. ), and even seems to have been in the fourth century regarded as the capital of the province of Valeria, and the residence of its Praeses or governor. (Ughelli, ap. Romanelli, vol. 3. p. 151.) The period of its destruction is unknown, but it seems to have been still in existence as late as the tenth century. After that time we find a city named Valva, which appears to have succeeded to the site of Corfinium, but has now also disappeared, though the adjoining valley is still called La Pianata di Valva. The site of Corfinium is clearly marked in the immediate neighbourhood of Pentima(a large village about 3 miles from Popoli, and 6 from Sulmona); the ruins of the ancient city, which are very inconsiderable, and consist of little more than shapeless fragments of buildings, are scattered round an ancient church called San Pelino, which was at one time the cathedral of Valva.But the numerous inscriptions discovered on the spot leave no doubt that this is the true site of Corfinium. The bridge over the Aternus, three miles from the latter city, is mentioned both by Caesar and Strabo, and must always have been a military point of the highest importance. Hence Domitius committed a capital error in neglecting to occupy it in sufficient force when Caesar was advancing upon Corfinium. (Caes. B.C. 1.16; Lucan (Luc. 2.484—504; Strab. 5. p. 242.) This bridge must evidently be the same, close to which the modern town of Popolihas grown up; this has been erroneously supposed by some authors to occupy the site of Corfinium. (Cluver. Ital. p. 758; Romanelli, vol. iii. pp. 148—156; Craven's Abruzzi, vol. 2. p. 18)
[E.H.B]